The Los Angeles Times is reporting that parents can no longer teach their children without a license--or something like that. The court decisions, according to the LA Times, says that parents must have a teaching credential to run a home school.
With that kind of logic, why not just license parents in the first place? No parenting without a license. Maybe I shouldn't risk giving judges ideas.
Once again this points up the ridiculous double standard being employed: Public schools are doing a demonstrably poor job educating children, while home schools on the whole do a good job. So who are we going after? The ones that aren't a problem.
Liberal judges strike again.