tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post6303601482811644447..comments2024-03-28T15:39:28.239-04:00Comments on Vital Remnants: Jake displays openly aggressive behavior on Rand PaulMartin Cothranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16452612266051351726noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-63908926414199192702010-11-19T03:56:18.212-05:002010-11-19T03:56:18.212-05:00Interesting article, added his blog to FavoritesInteresting article, added his blog to Favoritesviagrahttp://www.aiesec.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-57433436337819758492010-07-03T22:51:04.068-04:002010-07-03T22:51:04.068-04:00Thomas,
In your opinion, is Intelligent Design ba...Thomas,<br /><br />In your opinion, is Intelligent Design bad science? If so, why?Leehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12974887002402743628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-20452426815476824932010-07-02T10:32:59.439-04:002010-07-02T10:32:59.439-04:00I understand why people who accept evolution (amon...I understand why people who accept evolution (among whom I generally count myself) don't want fundamentalist creationism taught in schools -- it's bad science and bad theology. What I don't get is why so many people are so desperate that those who are agnostic on the issue immediately agree and accept evolution on their say-so.<br /><br />Biology is a complex science which almost Thomas M. Cothranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07824873424225826685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-76469374825204990052010-07-02T07:10:03.718-04:002010-07-02T07:10:03.718-04:00Marty,
Calling this a "difference of opinio...Marty, <br /><br />Calling this a "difference of opinion" is simply a fallacy. Evolution is real and is based on science. Creationism (except,perhaps, the currently untestable belief that God started the ball rolling) is a fable written by a far more ignorant people who used Gods and other explanations to talk about what they didn't understand. <br /><br />I think scientists Robhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08923161793979910495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-67487674573463848342010-07-01T19:05:11.240-04:002010-07-01T19:05:11.240-04:00Martin,
The figure of 4.5 billion years probably ...Martin,<br /><br />The figure of 4.5 billion years probably seems preposterous to you due to your lack of scientific expertise. Its based on dating dozens of meteorites using multiple radioactive materials, which all independently converge on roughly the same date.KyCobbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-4863049588880652432010-07-01T13:30:15.912-04:002010-07-01T13:30:15.912-04:00KyCobb,
I don't know why my views of how old ...KyCobb,<br /><br />I don't know why my views of how old the earth is would be important to anyone, and since I have no expertise in such scientific questions, I make it a habit not to address them, unlike a lot of other people I know on both sides of the issue who have no expertise either, but are perfectly willing to pontificate on the issue.<br /><br />My guess is that the universe is very Martin Cothranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16452612266051351726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-4853255555148519732010-07-01T10:59:57.721-04:002010-07-01T10:59:57.721-04:00Martin,
I'm still curious about you lumping t...Martin,<br /><br />I'm still curious about you lumping the age of the earth issue in with evolution, because the issue Paul dodged was not whether life evolved, but how old the earth is. There are creationists who nevertheless accept the fact that the earth is very old. So do you have an opinion about whether the earth is thousands of years old, or instead billions of years old, or is that KyCobbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11542449.post-29096709474708963552010-06-30T23:32:01.685-04:002010-06-30T23:32:01.685-04:00Absolutely hilarious.Absolutely hilarious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com